I agree as well, why can't there be two different binaries for Linux? ZD
> -----Original Message----- > From: Eugene Epshteyn [mailto:eugene_epshteyn@;yahoo.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 2:41 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Binary Distribution - new platform / compiler > > > > I agree. I think dumping g++ is a mistake. If you want to > provide optimized binaries, you could offer Intel Compiler > produced binaries in addition to the binaries generated by g++. > > --Eugene > > --- "Jason E. Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Tinny Ng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Because of an upgrade of our build system, we now use Intel C++ > > > Compiler Version 6 instead of g++ 3.1 to build the > Xerces-C++ Linux > > > 32 bit binary distribution. So any applications which > link with the > > > distributed Xerces-C++ 32 bit binary for Linux should be aware of > > > this change. Link errors may be resulted if your compiler is > > > different. > > > > Hey Tinny, > > > > That's a real shame. I would suspect that there easily an order of > > magnitude more people that use g++ on linux systems than > use the Intel > > compiler. > > > > jas. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > ===== > --- > Eugene Epshteyn > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.epshteyn.net > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos > http://launch.yahoo.com/u2 > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
