Hey Gareth,

Thanks for providing this!

A couple of problems:

   1. The tar.gz file has the date incorporated into the name, but the
   directory it contains does not.  This is inconsistent with the other
   nightly builds.
   2. There are no include files!

Dave



                                                                                       
                                                 
                      Gareth Reakes                                                    
                                                 
                      <gareth@decision         To:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]    
                                                 
                      soft.com>                cc:      (bcc: David N 
Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM)                                            
                                               Subject: Re: Binary Distribution - new 
platform / compiler                               
                      11/15/2002 08:24                                                 
                                                 
                      AM                                                               
                                                 
                      Please respond                                                   
                                                 
                      to xerces-c-dev                                                  
                                                 
                                                                                       
                                                 



Hi all,

we have a nightly build of xerces using gcc 3.2 at

http://software.decisionsoft.com/nightly/xerces/

we will add 2.96 when our sys gets round to it.


Tinny - is it worth putting a note somewhere in the download page about
this?

Gareth




On 14 Nov 2002, Jason E. Stewart wrote:

> "Gareth Reakes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > We will happily do this. We are about to sort out nightly builds
> > of Pathan anyway.
>
> Excellent! Thanks Gareth.
>
> > The only question I have is what compiler version(s) we
> > should compile with. I would suggest 2.96 and 3.2 . However, it seems
that
> > the current build is 3.1 . Does anyone require this? I will provide the

> > link later today.
>
> I have no reason for 3.1, and would definately need 3.2.
>
> Cheers,
> jas.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

--
Gareth Reakes, Head of Product Development
DecisionSoft Ltd.            http://www.decisionsoft.com
Office: +44 (0) 1865 203192



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to