I would much rather stick with make. From an implementation standpoint it's much easier to debug make on the end-user level than it is to work with another tool.
Steve On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Sander van Zoest wrote: > On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > > > > Stefano pointed out the existance of a Make tool implemented in > > > Java, which would be more than fine with me. I don't know how big the > > > download for this is, but it's worth investigating. As far as jar files > > > go, that would be fine with me as well. > > Another option would be to stick to pure 'make'. As in a subset of 'gmake' > > :-). > > I would vote for a pure 'make' install mechanism, so the FreeBSD version > could simply use the native pmake rather then requiring people to install > gmake or any other build tool. > > If we do require another build tool, it would be nice if it came with the > tarball sort of like ralfs' APACI for the apache http server. > > -- > Sander van Zoest [EMAIL > PROTECTED] > High Geek (858) 623-7442 > MP3.com, Inc. http://www.mp3.com/ >
