[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Since there aren't all that many nooks and crannies in Xerces left to > So could I propose that we set end-of-year as the absolute cut-off for > further XNI (1.0) changes? If we agree earlier that there are no more > changes which will need to be made, then so much the better. > > Does this seem flexiblle enough to other people in the community? Alex, > does this help give you confidence that soon there'll be a stable target to > program against?
hi Neil, that sounds really good - i have a lot of confidence in Xerces 2 :-) i am just worried about backward incompatible changes and that i will no longer be able to write code that works with all versions of Xerces 2. thanks, alek --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
