> I want to validate that I got a Car and process the Car even though the Car was really a >CompanyXCar(ie. I am ignoring data from other namespaces) The standard solution for that is to have everyone agree on a base schema for Car and derive their customized CompanyXCars from that. Then CompanyXCar will be an instance of the shared Car and everything just works. If you can't get that agreement... you may be stuck with transcoding the documents from their source schema into your desired schema before operating on them. ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman, IBM Next-Generation Web Technologies: XML, XSL and more. "The world changed profoundly and unpredictably the day Tim Berners Lee got bitten by a radioactive spider." -- Rafe Culpin, in r.m.filk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- dynamic validation, is this a bug Dean Hiller
- Re: dynamic validation, is this a bug Mike Rawlins
- Re: dynamic validation, is this a b... Dean Hiller
- Re: dynamic validation, is this... Mike Rawlins
- Re: dynamic validation, is ... Dean Hiller
- Re: dynamic validation, is this a bug Sandy Gao
- Re: dynamic validation, is this a b... Dean Hiller
- Re: dynamic validation, is this a b... Dean Hiller
- Re: dynamic validation, is this... Joseph Kesselman
- Re: dynamic validation, is ... Dean Hiller
- Re: dynamic validation, is this... Mike Rawlins
- Re: dynamic validation, is ... Dean Hiller
- RE: dynamic validation, is this a bug Holliday, Donald B. (LNG-CSP)
- Re: dynamic validation, is this a b... Dean Hiller
- Re: dynamic validation, is this... Jeff Greif
- Re: dynamic validation, is this a bug Sandy Gao
- Re: dynamic validation, is this a b... Dean Hiller
- Re: dynamic validation, is this a b... Dean Hiller
- Re: dynamic validation, is this a bug Sandy Gao
