On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 09:28 +0300, Urho Konttori wrote: > I would definitely like to keep Nepomuk as the ontology name. It is > already a name that has a lot of backing from high valu players : > http://nepomuk.semanticdesktop.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main1/Participants > > Nepomuk is the only viable foundation for semantic desktop ontology. > Nepomuk namespace is already in use in KDE. > > Now, as to the OSCAF foundation maintaining the ontology, freedesktop, > w3c, whatnot, I would also really prefer that there would be one > ontology that is being pointed to. Having said that, we need to be able > to make changes to the ontogy in faster pace than it has seemed to be > happening recently.
One particular set of changes of which I believe another free software project, Akonadi, might be affected are the changes that we did to Nepomuk's Message Ontology. You can find it here: http://git.gnome.org/cgit/tracker/tree/data/ontologies/34-nmo.ontology The changes are marked with "# FIXME Extension requested in Nepomuk" I made a few samples on how to use this ontology here: http://live.gnome.org/Tracker/Documentation/EmailSparql Given the impact on NMO I think these ontology changes require special attention. The people to get in touch with about these changes are me, Ivan Frade and Evgeny Egorochkin by the way. -- Philip Van Hoof, freelance software developer home: me at pvanhoof dot be gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org http://pvanhoof.be/blog http://codeminded.be _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
