On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 10:49 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 20:14 +0200, Roberto Guido wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 18:18 +0200, Leo Sauermann wrote: > > > I would like to know the names of people who > > > feel responsible to work for the quality. I would like to see an > > > ontology maintainer/editor for each ontology. > > > > > Here I am: after so many criticism, I'm curious to follow the game as > > near as possible. I candidate myself for NMO. > > Note that NMO will be among the most difficult to maintain as me and > Evgeny Egorochkin have already made quite a bit of changes to it, that > will somehow have to be upstreamed. > > You can find a TTL of the NMO as how we'll need it here: > > http://git.gnome.org/cgit/tracker/tree/data/ontologies/34-nmo.ontology > > > Pro: > > - enough time to follow evolution of discussions > > - supported by an italian company involved in semantic free software > > development (and perhaps next OSCAF member ;-) ) > > > > Cons: > > - little experience in maintainance of large projects, so a mentor would > > be appreciated at least in the beginning > > I'm sure Evgeny Egorochkin will help you with that, wont you Phreedom?
I can help with co-maintainership too. If the other Nepomuk team members agree I propose co-maintaining NMO. Pro: - I wrote Tinymail, a library that abstracts MIME, IMAP and POP for E-mail client developers. I was involved in the development of Modest, an E-mail client being used by Nokia. - I made the changes to the NMO ontology in Tracker, so that it would be possible to store MIME formatted messages Cons: - Same as above, it means I have a small bias on what yesterday's E-mail clients needed to pragmatically accomplish 'being an E-mail client'. - I somewhat understand MIME and IMAP's BODYSTRUCTURE. Apparently that's a con ;-) (it must have frustrated Evgeny a lot). _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list Xesam@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
