KS> Are you still planning to contribute this code? It sounds like it would be KS> a really good starting place.
I think it would be no problem. We have JUST finished the prototype though and JUnit shows it works ok. My good guess would be to hold on a month or two - we'll gain experience on the interface, its pros and cons, and contribute a more reliable, stable version. Another side of this coin is that we have it implemented in a very structural-like approach, i.e. there has been no class-responsibility analysis etc. The reason for it is that we intentionally wanted the interface to be so simple. We may change it in the future - time will tell. KS> That's what we're trying to figure out. I don't actually use Xindice for KS> anything, so I rely on the real users to tell us what we need. I'm glad to hear it. Dawid
