I agree. I'm a little light on LogFactory specifics, having mostly used Log4J. It seems like just extra overhead to do the getClass().getName() if we can do without it.
--Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Vladimir R. Bossicard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 11:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: LogFactory.getLogger() > +1 on getClass().getName(), everywhere (not just the server). I would prefer CLASS.class to take advantage of the LogFactory:getLog(Class cls) method. Why use the class's name transformed into a String when the class itself is a valid option? -Vladimir -- Vladimir R. Bossicard Apache Xindice - http://xml.apache.org/xindice
