Although I am not well versed in xindice... I would be willing to donate my 
time to get this working, as a large project I am working on would benefit 
greatly from it. Where would I go or who would I ask about helping out?

Thanks

Joe Cole
> 
> From: Vanessa Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2002/12/17 Tue AM 10:44:51 GMT+13:00
> To: xindice-users@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Embedding XIndice
> 
> This topic's been going round and round for months. It's something a 
> lot of people want/need, but AFAIK the implementation of it is not 
> stable and there's no documentation on how to do it. I sincerely hope 
> this is going to be resolved before 1.1 is released.
> 
> On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 12:55  AM, Joe Cole wrote:
> 
> > eXist does this, but from my initial inquiries show it has less 
> > functionality than xindice...
> >  
> > If you look on the mailing list archive with the search embed you will 
> > find some information --- the only code to support it is in CVS and it 
> > is unstable... hopefully there will be some progress soon :)
> >  
> > joe 
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: James W. Thompson, II
> > To: xindice-users@xml.apache.org
> > Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 6:22 PM
> > Subject: RE: Embedding XIndice
> >
> > I think I would be interested in what you are referring to as well?I 
> > am developing a demo of an application using normal Xindice as a 
> > server but I would be quite interested in embedding Xindice as a 
> > invoke-on-demand type config instead of a standing server?.the ability 
> > to use xindice as an integral part of my application without have to 
> > run it as a server app/service would be quite ideal for a final 
> > design?.
> >
> >  
> >
> > -Dubbs (JThompson)
> >
> >  
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joe Cole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2002 11:48 PM
> > To: xindice-users@xml.apache.org
> > Subject: Embedding XIndice
> >
> >  
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >  
> >
> > When I mean embedded, I mean using xindice as a normal api, without 
> > any tomcat/servers running. I am just going to be using it for storage 
> > of documents in my desktop applicaton. (Users are dumb)
> >
> > I see there was a little bit of talk about this a while back on the 
> > mailing list. I am currently trying to get eXist working, and its 
> > going well, but would like to be able to use xindice preferably.
> >
> > Did anyone who tried end up getting the embedded version working, or 
> > could someone point me in the right direction to code up an embedded 
> > solution?
> >
> >  
> >
> > Any help would be appreciated
> >
> >  
> >
> > Joe Cole
> >
> >  
> >
> >
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.fridgebuzz.com
> 
> This topic's been going round and round for months. It's something a
> lot of people want/need, but AFAIK the implementation of it is not
> stable and there's no documentation on how to do it. I sincerely hope
> this is going to be resolved before 1.1 is released.
> 
> 
> On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 12:55  AM, Joe Cole wrote:
> 
> 
> <excerpt><fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>eXist does this, but
> from my initial inquiries show it has less functionality than
> xindice...</smaller></fontfamily>
> 
>  
> 
> <fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>If you look on the mailing
> list archive with the search embed you will find some information ---
> the only code to support it is in CVS and it is unstable... hopefully
> there will be some progress soon :)</smaller></fontfamily>
> 
>  
> 
> <fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>joe</smaller></fontfamily> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> 
> <bold>From:</bold>
> <underline><color><param>0000,0000,FFFE</param>James W. Thompson, 
> II</color></underline>
> 
> <bold>To:</bold>
> <underline><color><param>0000,0000,FFFE</param>xindice-users@xml.apache.org</color></underline>
> 
> <bold>Sent:</bold> Monday, December 16, 2002 6:22 PM
> 
> <bold>Subject:</bold> RE: Embedding XIndice
> 
> 
> <fontfamily><param>Arial</param><color><param>0000,0000,807F</param><smaller>I
> think I would be interested in what you are referring to as well?I am
> developing a demo of an application using normal Xindice as a server
> but I would be quite interested in embedding Xindice as a
> invoke-on-demand type config instead of a standing server?.the ability
> to use xindice as an integral part of my application without have to
> run it as a server app/service would be quite ideal for a final
> design?.</smaller></color></fontfamily>
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> <fontfamily><param>Arial</param><color><param>0000,0000,807F</param><smaller>-Dubbs
> (JThompson)</smaller></color></fontfamily>
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> <fontfamily><param>Tahoma</param><smaller>-----Original Message-----
> 
> <bold>From:</bold> Joe Cole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> <bold>Sent:</bold> Sunday, December 15, 2002 11:48 PM
> 
> <bold>To:</bold> xindice-users@xml.apache.org
> 
> <bold>Subject:</bold> Embedding XIndice</smaller></fontfamily>
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> <fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>Hi,</smaller></fontfamily>
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> <fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>When I mean embedded, I mean
> using xindice as a normal api, without any tomcat/servers running. I
> am just going to be using it for storage of documents in my desktop
> applicaton. (Users are dumb)</smaller></fontfamily>
> 
> 
> <fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>I see there was a little bit
> of talk about this a while back on the mailing list. I am currently
> trying to get eXist working, and its going well, but would like to be
> able to use xindice preferably.</smaller></fontfamily>
> 
> 
> <fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>Did anyone who tried end up
> getting the embedded version working, or could someone point me in the
> right direction to code up an embedded solution?</smaller></fontfamily>
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> <fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>Any help would be 
> appreciated</smaller></fontfamily>
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> <fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>Joe Cole</smaller></fontfamily>
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> </excerpt>--
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> www.fridgebuzz.com
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to