David,
Perhaps so. But in any case, you know as well I as that the W3C has not yet
approved an XML Schema Recommendation.
Rachel
-----Original Message-----
From: David RR Webber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2000 12:24 PM
To: INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: XML Schemas/DTD for HealthCare Industry
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
If such enabling architecture techniques, etc. existed that truly enabled
interoperable automated XML-based document exchange such as that envisioned
by James there would be no need for the global efforts of the ebXML
Initiative,<
>>>>>>>>>>>
Rachel,
I believe what James was trying to tell you was that the
W3C Schema has this all solved already with their datatyping
and structure methods based on an OO approach.
All we have to do is get everyone using this consistently
and the parsers upgraded and it should just all work.
DW.
------ XML/edi Group Discussion List ------
Homepage = http://www.XMLedi-Group.org
Unsubscribe = send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leave the subject and body of the message blank
Questions/requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To receive only one message per day (digest format)
send the following message to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
(leave the subject line blank)
digest xmledi-group your-email-address
To join the XML/edi Group complete the form located at:
http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm
