Mike:

        This is really a hard issue.  There are problems with the W3C
schema specification.  Every W3C situation I have encountered with my
clients who have contracted to have a W3C Schema created has issues.  The
schema parses with the tool that was used to create the schema but does
not parse on any other schema parser.  IMHO this is a very serious
situation. This means that the user is locked into a vendor specific
product.  I don't believe this is because of vendor's diligence but
because of ambiguities in the specification.

        Whether RelaxNG or W3C Schema's win is a wild guess.  However,
if you compare the two, RelaxNG is less complex, more understandable
and easier to learn.

        I believe RelaxNG is getting some 'wings' behind it because of
the OASIS-Open endorsement and the fact that it is going through ISO.
Timing is critical though, as we all know.  The best solution doesn't
always win.

        A lot of the organizations that I have seen that are busy
developing W3C Schemas are being sold a 'bill of goods' from
consultants and are not given a fair and balanced argument between
W3C, RelaxNG and DTD's.

        Naturally these are just my opinions which you take with
a grain of salt |-).

Betty

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Betty Harvey, XML Consultant,        | Phone: 410-787-9200 FAX: 9830
Electronic Commerce Connection, Inc. |
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                    | Washington,DC SGML/XML Users Grp
URL:  http://www.eccnet.com          | http://www.eccnet.com/xmlug/
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\\/\/

On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Mike Rawlins wrote:

> Thanks for pointing out the article, David.  I *may* read it.  But, I wonder
> this:  Regardless of technical merits and deficiencies, does anyone outside
> of a small community of SGML/XML gurus really think that RELAX NG has a
> snowball's chance of success when considered against the mindshare and cachet
> of W3C schema?   I really have no opinion on the issue, but try to meet the
> needs of my clients.  What I hear from my clients and most of my colleagues
> is this:  We're doing W3C schema because W3C sets the XML standards.  This
> choice is primarily for business reasons and not technical reasons.  They ask
> "What's RELAX NG?"  Some of them even ask "Who's OASIS?"
>
> What does anyone else on this list think?  Are your companies or clients
> aware of RELAX NG, or interested in it?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mike
>
> David RR Webber - XMLGlobal wrote:
>
> > FYI,
> >
> > XML.com article.  Examplotron is also cool
> > technology for defining context within EDI
> > structures...more on that anon!!
> >
> > DW.
> >
> > -------------Forwarded Message-----------------
> >
> > From:   Eric van der Vlist, INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To:     , INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Date:   1/24/2002  1:09 PM
> >
> > RE:     [relax-ng] New article on RELAX NG vs W3C XML Schema
> >
> >
> > I hope you'll enjoy reading it as much as I have enjoyed writing it!
> >
> > RELAX NG is like a breath of fresh air...
> >
> > http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/01/23/relaxng.html
> >
> > Eric
> > --
> > Rendez-vous a Paris pour les Electronic Business Days 2002.
> >                                    http://www.edifrance.org/ebd/index.htm
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
> > http://xsltunit.org      http://4xt.org           http://examplotron.org
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > ------   XML/edi Group Discussion List   ------
> > Homepage
> > Unsubscribe Leave the subject and body of the message blank
> >
> > Questions/requests:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > To receive only one message per day (digest format)
> > send the following message to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > (leave the subject line blank)
> >
> > digest xmledi-group your-email-address
> >
> > To join the XML/edi Group complete the form located at:
> > http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm
>
> --
> Michael C. Rawlins, Rawlins EC Consulting
> www.rawlinsecconsulting.com
>
>
>
>
> ------   XML/edi Group Discussion List   ------
> Homepage =  http://www.XMLedi-Group.org
>
> Unsubscribe =  send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Leave the subject and body of the message blank
>
> Questions/requests:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To receive only one message per day (digest format)
> send the following message to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> (leave the subject line blank)
>
> digest xmledi-group your-email-address
>
> To join the XML/edi Group complete the form located at:
> http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm
>
>

-- 




------   XML/edi Group Discussion List   ------
Homepage =  http://www.XMLedi-Group.org

Unsubscribe =  send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leave the subject and body of the message blank

Questions/requests:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To receive only one message per day (digest format) 
send the following message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
(leave the subject line blank) 

digest xmledi-group your-email-address

To join the XML/edi Group complete the form located at:
http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm


Reply via email to