There is a European Rosettanet user group but as Hans says it is mainly electronics and manufacturing companies. The current leader of the organization is from Siemens AG. If you would like a contact for him email me offline.
www.edifice.org/ERUG/ERUG-020611-TC.ppt Regards, David Frenkel Business Development GEFEG USA Global Leader in Ecommerce Tools www.gefeg.com 425-260-5030 -----Original Message----- From: Hans Flemming Stern-Peltz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 3:47 AM To: XMLEDI Group Subject: VS: Mapping Robin, that is true. RosettaNets focus is on B2B in the High-tech industries i.e. Electronic Components and IT Manufacturing and not Retail. However a lot of the business processes covered are more universal in nature, so they could be - and are - used by organisations outside the focused industries. And as a lot of Application Server vendors support it directly in their solutions, it is pretty easy to implement. The hard thing is finding your information in the Backend Systems to support the Partner Interface Process. It is true that RosettaNet originally was a initiative from the US, but in its foundation it is aimed at being global - actually the regionality issue was one of the issues to be addressed. There is a lot of activity implementing RosettaNet in Europe these days with a lot of european channelmasters, whose business by nature is global, embracing RosettaNet. I would believe that there is about a 40/40/20 split between US/APAC/EUROPE and that will change. Kind regards Hans Flemming Stern-Peltz -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Robin Declercq [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sendt: 3. december 2002 12:14 Til: XMLEDI Group Emne: RE: Mapping Hans, i am not aware of any large European retailer supporting RosettaNet. It seems the focal point at the moment is the US? regards, robin -----Original Message----- From: Hans Flemming Stern-Peltz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: maandag 2 december 2002 22:14 To: XMLEDI Group Subject: VS: Mapping ....which is why RosettaNet (http://www.rosettanet.org) is interesting to look at - they use Business processes as their off-set, not documents. And they actually have a lot of implementations by now. This shows that when an industry sets out to do something and commit to it it will happen. You will find a lot of the Application Server vendors supporting RosettaNet and having a mapping utility for mapping i.e. RosettaNet. Kind regards Hans Flemming Stern-Peltz -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: David Frenkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sendt: 2. december 2002 19:39 Til: XMLEDI Group Emne: RE: Mapping Robin, Yes there are plenty of small suppliers in the clothing side of retail but the big box discounters still have to work with large companies like P&G, Nestle, General Mills, 3M, Honeywell, etc. I have worked with large vendors and when a trading partner gets too demanding the relationships get strained and sometimes temporarily broken. Regards, David Frenkel Business Development GEFEG USA Global Leader in Ecommerce Tools www.gefeg.com 425-260-5030 -----Original Message----- From: Robin Declercq [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 4:43 AM To: XMLEDI Group Subject: RE: Mapping Geoff, in my experience, the party that does the mapping usually is the party with the most bargaining power/ clout. A lot is industry-dependant, e.g. the Retail sector is characterised by few large retailers and a lot of small suppliers. Typically, the large retailers can force its suppliers to perform mappings, and/or to use a web/EDI application to bridge the two systems. In my opinion it mostly boils down to a negotiation process between exchanging parties. kind regards, Robin __________________ tectrade Robin Declercq Project Manager Tel. +32(0)50/30 30 30 www.tectrade.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Geoffrey Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: maandag 2 december 2002 12:57 To: XMLEDI Group Subject: Mapping A question - it is rare to be able to get both partners in an interchange to use the same schema / standard. Someone has to map. What is the view as to who should best do this? As a general rule I prefer to take a message in the format of the issuer and map to my schemas that tie in with my back-end processes. Similarly I prefer to send a message in my format and let the recipient map. Is there a "best practice" view amongst the group? Geoff Carter --- You are currently subscribed to xmledi-group as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are currently subscribed to xmledi-group as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are currently subscribed to xmledi-group as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are currently subscribed to xmledi-group as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are currently subscribed to xmledi-group as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are currently subscribed to xmledi-group as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are currently subscribed to xmledi-group as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
