Hussein Shafie wrote: > John L. Clark wrote: > >> According to your XML catalog resolution list[0], XML catalogs are not >> used to resolve the URIs found in the xml-stylesheet processing >> instruction (which XXE supports). My testing indicates that this is >> correct. If this is, in fact, the case, I would like to request this as >> yet another place where XML catalogs could be used. > > OK, we could add this, but we would like to learn why you still need to > use the xml-stylesheet processing instruction when you have XXE > configuration files.
I second the request for xml-stylesheet support. In a rich, open working environment XXE will certainly not be the only tool available for XML data/document handling. > > Initially the xml-stylesheet processing instruction was supported only > to ease the transition from XXE Milestone 1.x (which had no > configuration files) to XXE V2. > > We could easily drop the support of this standard processing instruction > in future versions (V3), unless we are explained why it is useful *for > XXE* (i.e. we already know why it is useful for *other software* such as > Web browsers, but for XXE ???) I think it is useful at least for XXE stylesheet developers. You can specify a stable stylesheet for useful work in configuration files, and a development version of the stylesheed in a PI inside test documents. That's the reason why I asked (in another thread) to have both styleheets listed in the style menu. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Manuel Collado Machuca | Facultad de Informatica UPM Universidad Politecnica de Madrid | Campus de Montegancedo Dep. LSIIS | Boadilla del Monte Tel.+34-91-336.74.57 Fax.+34-91-336.74.12 | 28660 MADRID - SPAIN ------------------------------------------------------------------------
