Manuel Collado wrote: > Hussein Shafie wrote: > >> John L. Clark wrote: >> >>> According to your XML catalog resolution list[0], XML catalogs are not >>> used to resolve the URIs found in the xml-stylesheet processing >>> instruction (which XXE supports). My testing indicates that this is >>> correct. If this is, in fact, the case, I would like to request this as >>> yet another place where XML catalogs could be used. >> >> >> OK, we could add this, but we would like to learn why you still need >> to use the xml-stylesheet processing instruction when you have XXE >> configuration files. > > > I second the request for xml-stylesheet support. In a rich, open working > environment XXE will certainly not be the only tool available for XML > data/document handling.
I didn't want to be arrogant. I know that there are plenty of other XML softwares which understand <?xml-stylesheet?>. I meant: why is the xml-stylesheet processing instruction still useful *in the case of XXE*, when you have configuration files? Thanks for taking the time to give us your answer to this question. Another question is: has anybody succeeded in using the same CSS style sheet for XXE and for another <?xml-stylesheet?>-enabled XML software? In such case, no longer supporting <?xml-stylesheet?> in XXE V3 would be an error.
