Devin Bayer wrote:
> 
> > PS: In XXE, if you have a stylesheet available, you really never, ever,
> > need to use the tree view. If it is the case, may be you have missed
> > something in the tutorial. No offense intended and of course, I'm not
> > pretending that XXE is perfect. But the fact is that here at XMLmind, we
> > never, ever, use the tree view, just the styled view.
> 
> This comment surprised me.  I edit fairly large DocBook books with
> XMLmind and I find the combined tree-styled view useful.  Without it
> there is no other way to easily navigate to a specific chapter.  With
> scrolling it's hard to pinpoint the correct place to stop and using the
> keyboard take a while to move, say, up 3 levels, then down 4 chapters.
> Using the tree view showing only chapters I can quickly click the
> applicable chapter and the styled view would scroll to that point.
> 
> Since the tree view isn't supposed to be used for styled XML I suggest
> that it be made more usable as a outline of the document that can be
> quickly navigated.  If chapters/sections/appendixes etc... were
> identified by their titles or ids instead of their element names it
> would be very useful.  Also the tree should automatically expand in the
> right places.  I would like the tree to always fill up the left pane
> (top to bottom) but not overflow.  Within this constrant it should try
> to keep the 1st-level of elements displayed (chapters/parts in a book).
>   Then expand the hierarcy up to the current element.  By the last
> sentance I mean display all the siblings, parents, and parent's siblings
> of the current element.
> 
> On a related note:  When selecting an element in the tree view it is too
> easy to select a parent element.  When clicking vertically between two
> siblings it should not select a parent but instead the closest sibling.
> 
> There.  That's a couple wishlist items for XXE that would enhance
> productivity.

Thanks for your suggestions.

May be the reason why we don't need to use the tree view here at XMLmind
is that we don't edit large documents.

Reply via email to