I would second Devin Bayer's comments. What would be really nice would to be
able to create a customized tree view that just showed certain nodes (i.e,
section titles). I have made myself a secondary CSS file that just shows
(indented) section titles, and I use it as a navigation aid, but of course
it isn't collapsible like the tree view. I find the tree view, on the other
hand, too detailed.

Another issue is that in Windows, at least, the expand/collapse symbols
(+/-) are rather difficult to select - I think this is because the cursor is
displayed as a caret mark rather than as an arrow.

Minor points really - XXE is mostly excellent!

-----Original Message-----
From: Hussein Shafie [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 18. oktober 2002 17:49
To: Devin Bayer
Cc: xmleditor-support at xmlmind.com
Subject: Re: Using The Tree View


Devin Bayer wrote:
> 
> > PS: In XXE, if you have a stylesheet available, you really never, ever,
> > need to use the tree view. If it is the case, may be you have missed
> > something in the tutorial. No offense intended and of course, I'm not
> > pretending that XXE is perfect. But the fact is that here at XMLmind, we
> > never, ever, use the tree view, just the styled view.
> 
> This comment surprised me.  I edit fairly large DocBook books with
> XMLmind and I find the combined tree-styled view useful.  Without it
> there is no other way to easily navigate to a specific chapter.  With
> scrolling it's hard to pinpoint the correct place to stop and using the
> keyboard take a while to move, say, up 3 levels, then down 4 chapters.
> Using the tree view showing only chapters I can quickly click the
> applicable chapter and the styled view would scroll to that point.
> 
> Since the tree view isn't supposed to be used for styled XML I suggest
> that it be made more usable as a outline of the document that can be
> quickly navigated.  If chapters/sections/appendixes etc... were
> identified by their titles or ids instead of their element names it
> would be very useful.  Also the tree should automatically expand in the
> right places.  I would like the tree to always fill up the left pane
> (top to bottom) but not overflow.  Within this constrant it should try
> to keep the 1st-level of elements displayed (chapters/parts in a book).
>   Then expand the hierarcy up to the current element.  By the last
> sentance I mean display all the siblings, parents, and parent's siblings
> of the current element.
> 
> On a related note:  When selecting an element in the tree view it is too
> easy to select a parent element.  When clicking vertically between two
> siblings it should not select a parent but instead the closest sibling.
> 
> There.  That's a couple wishlist items for XXE that would enhance
> productivity.

Thanks for your suggestions.

May be the reason why we don't need to use the tree view here at XMLmind
is that we don't edit large documents.
--
XMLmind XML Editor Support List
xmleditor-support at xmlmind.com
http://www.xmlmind.com/mailman/listinfo/xmleditor-support

Reply via email to