Yes, I can imagine (and had already accepted) that colouring text in the
XML editor window based on an attribute setting would not be a trivial
task. An XSLT tweak for using the same attributes to style WebHelp/.pdf
output, though, would be pretty nifty :-}

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Hussein Shafie <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 01/12/2015 08:38 AM, Niels Grundtvig Nielsen wrote:
>
>> Well, you're right there – the Compare tool seems to do an excellent job
>> of identifying changes between files. The only snag is, that's not what
>> I need to do at the moment: I need to use the out-of-the-DITA-box status
>> attribute to apply different styles to WebHelp (and possibly pdf) output.
>>
>
> We are aware of this need, which is not an uncommon one.
>
>
>
>
>> I suspect this is going to mean rolling my sleeves up and trying to get
>> somewhere with XSLT :-}
>>
>
> There are two problems here:
>
> 1) Marking modified elements using the DITA status attribute. I don't see
> how this problem can be solved simply.
>
> A future version of the Compare tool could be used to automatically mark
> modified elements using the DITA status attribute. However only new and
> modified elements could be marked this way, not deleted elements. This
> makes this feature not really useful.
>
> 2) Correctly rendering DITA elements bearing the status attribute by
> slightly modifying the XSLT stylesheets. This problem should be quite
> simple to solve.
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Hussein Shafie <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 01/05/2015 10:36 AM, Niels Grundtvig Nielsen wrote:
>>
>>         Getting into the swing of things using DITA for deliverables
>>         here, and
>>         now we've reached the stage where the first document needs an
>> upate.
>>         This prompts the question "what do you suggest for implementing
>>         track
>>         changes": should I use <ph> elements with attributes and tweak the
>>         stylesheet so I can mark added and deleted text,
>>
>>
>>     Personally, I would never do this given the fact we have the Compare
>>     tool:
>>
>>     http://www.xmlmind.com/__xmleditor/_distrib/doc/help/__
>> comparePane_primer.html
>>     <http://www.xmlmind.com/xmleditor/_distrib/doc/help/
>> comparePane_primer.html>
>>
>>
>>
>>         or is there some more elegant approach?
>>
>>
>>     Tutorial (including a screencast):
>>
>>     "Reviewing changes using the Compare tool" --
>>     http://www.xmlmind.com/__xmleditor/_tutorial/review___
>> changes/index.html
>>     <http://www.xmlmind.com/xmleditor/_tutorial/review_changes/index.html
>> >
>>
>>     OK, it's not change tracking per se (à la MS-Word), but it
>>     implements a similar functionality and it works flawlessly whatever
>>     the number and the complexity of the changes. I mean the author of a
>>     document will never miss a change made by a reviewer.
>>
>>     So my advice is: please give this feature a *serious* try. It will
>>     do the job and you'll like it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> XMLmind XML Editor Support List
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.xmlmind.com/mailman/listinfo/xmleditor-support
>>
>>
>
--
XMLmind XML Editor Support List
[email protected]
http://www.xmlmind.com/mailman/listinfo/xmleditor-support

Reply via email to