> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:14:36 -0800 > From: Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]> > > Carl Worth wrote: > > My big concern is with making the build even more fragile than it > > already is. We already have lots of documentation teaching people to add > > ${prefix}/lib/pkgconfig to PKG_CONFIG_PATH and I've not ever seen > > documentation telling people to add ${prefix}/share/pkgconfig as > > well. So the change makes a lot of existing instructions stop working. > > Welcome to last month. All the tinderboxes & build scripts had to be > updated when this change hit libxtrans, since otherwise libX11 & xserver > stopped building.
Which proves the point that purely puristic changes like this shouldn't be made. I say puristic here, because nobody in their right might would actually share the these .pc between architectures. You use a seperate sandbox for that. Saving a few kB by sharing a few header files and these .pc files simply isn't worth the pain of having to make sure things are kept in sync. We really need to keep churn like that to the minimum. _______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
