On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 15:43 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > What's the state of this patch? Seems like it should default to > whatever the old default was in the absence of a dri.pc file? Or is > everyone happy with the patch as-is? >
The only use of the driver path is within a formatted string.
Should the glx code attempt to load a driver when the dri package is
missing,
the load will fail as the filaname would be "/driverName_dri.so".
snprintf(filename, sizeof filename,
"%s/%s_dri.so", dri_driver_path, driverName);
./glx/glxdriswrast.c:static const char dri_driver_path[] =
DRI_DRIVER_PATH;
./glx/glxdriswrast.c: "%s/%s_dri.so", dri_driver_path,
driverName);
./glx/glxdri2.c:static const char dri_driver_path[] = DRI_DRIVER_PATH;
./glx/glxdri2.c: "%s/%s_dri.so", dri_driver_path,
driverName);
./glx/glxdri.c:static const char dri_driver_path[] = DRI_DRIVER_PATH;
./glx/glxdri.c: dri_driver_path, driverName);
Thanks for the review,
Gaetan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
