1On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 11:46 +0800, Huang, FrankR wrote: > First of all, I can not accept the manner you used in your mail on > this issue. Every change has its reason in the world. I think Your > "wrong wrong wrong" conclusion is too early. Science(absolutely > include the software codes) has no absolute wrong and right. We can > discuss and give the reason. If we are wrong, we can accept. > Furthermore, have you gotten this issue very clear before you give > this conclustion?
Just to be clear: stating that your code is wrong is not an insult. It's statement about the code, not about you. However, you don't seem to have understood why anyone in this thread is disagreeing with you, so I'm done trying to change your mind. - ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
