Twas brillig at 20:57:37 29.11.2010 UTC-08 when [email protected] did gyre and gimble:
AC> The meat of this series is sandwiched right in the middle - patch AC> #6 replaces the nifty, but unique, Xprintf() API with a local AC> implementation of the asprintf() family that's becoming widely AC> adopted (found in recent versions of the GNU, FreeBSD, NetBSD, AC> OpenBSD, & Solaris libc's, but not yet in all the versions & AC> platforms we still support). Is there particular reason why local implementation of asprintf/vasprintf have to have X prefix? Why not define them as plain asprintf/vasprintf from the beginning? (XNF has to stay, sigh). If this issue is resolved (see also additional nitpick in patch 06) Reviewed-by: Mikhail Gusarov <[email protected]> -- http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/
pgpV6VmA50iTi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
