On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:51:07PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > libshadow depends on libfb for fbGetWinPrivateKey > libvbe depends on libint10 for xf86Int10AllocPages, xf86Int10FreePages, > xf86ExecX86int10, xf86ExtendedInitInt10, xf86FreeInt10, xf86int10Addr > > Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]> > --- > hw/xfree86/dixmods/Makefile.am | 1 + > hw/xfree86/vbe/Makefile.am | 1 + > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/xfree86/dixmods/Makefile.am b/hw/xfree86/dixmods/Makefile.am > index 1a162ab..10001a5 100644 > --- a/hw/xfree86/dixmods/Makefile.am > +++ b/hw/xfree86/dixmods/Makefile.am > @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ librecord_la_SOURCES = recordmod.c > > libshadow_la_LDFLAGS = -avoid-version > libshadow_la_LIBADD = $(top_builddir)/miext/shadow/libshadow.la > +libshadow_la_LIBADD += libfb.la
Just linking these together doesn't seem right, since it won't initialize it as a module. Should it call xf86LoadSubModule at runtime instead? > libshadow_la_SOURCES = shmodule.c > > libdixmods_la_SOURCES = $(top_srcdir)/mi/miinitext.c > diff --git a/hw/xfree86/vbe/Makefile.am b/hw/xfree86/vbe/Makefile.am > index 85c6fd8..1e245e6 100644 > --- a/hw/xfree86/vbe/Makefile.am > +++ b/hw/xfree86/vbe/Makefile.am > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ > module_LTLIBRARIES = libvbe.la > libvbe_la_LDFLAGS = -avoid-version > +libvbe_la_LIBADD = $(top_builddir)/hw/xfree86/int10/libint10.la > libvbe_la_SOURCES = vbe.c vbeModes.c vbe_module.c > > sdk_HEADERS = vbe.h vbeModes.h > -- > 1.7.3.2 _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
