On 09/19/11 15:12, Aaron Plattner wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:51:07PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
libshadow depends on libfb for fbGetWinPrivateKey
libvbe depends on libint10 for xf86Int10AllocPages, xf86Int10FreePages,
xf86ExecX86int10, xf86ExtendedInitInt10, xf86FreeInt10, xf86int10Addr
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith<[email protected]>
---
hw/xfree86/dixmods/Makefile.am | 1 +
hw/xfree86/vbe/Makefile.am | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/dixmods/Makefile.am b/hw/xfree86/dixmods/Makefile.am
index 1a162ab..10001a5 100644
--- a/hw/xfree86/dixmods/Makefile.am
+++ b/hw/xfree86/dixmods/Makefile.am
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ librecord_la_SOURCES = recordmod.c
libshadow_la_LDFLAGS = -avoid-version
libshadow_la_LIBADD = $(top_builddir)/miext/shadow/libshadow.la
+libshadow_la_LIBADD += libfb.la
Just linking these together doesn't seem right, since it won't initialize
it as a module. Should it call xf86LoadSubModule at runtime instead?
Honestly, I don't know - this patch was added to our server as part of work
to satisfy linker dependencies, and I'm not that familiar with
xf86LoadSubModule.
Is there any time libfb wouldn't be already initialized? Now that cfb etal
are dead, does it make sense to still have fb as a loadable module instead
of just building it into the core server?
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [email protected]
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
