On 2012-03-20 19:02, Daniel Stone wrote: > Hi, > > On 20 March 2012 17:55, Pander <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 2012-03-20 16:41, Julien Cristau wrote: >>> Then let's make it consistent by only having one of the orders for new >>> sequences. Over time people will get the order that actually works in >>> muscle memory, we won't have so many duplicate sequences that make it >>> impossible to ever add new ones for new symbols, everyone wins. >> >> I completely agree on this policy for new series of sequences. >> >> [...] >> >> Since this concerns an existing conflict and not a new sequence, I hope >> you see the international value of resolving this to map <o> >> <apostrophe> to ó. This will result truly in a win-win situatión with >> the same compose sequences for all users of X, including GNOME. > > I completely agree; I'm struggling to think of a single use for å with > a combining acute accent, whereas ó is a character people actually > use. A lot. > > Cheers, > Daniel
Thanks. And alternative sequnces to create å with a combining acute accent remain in tact. James, Julien, did you receive enough compelling arguments to resolve this conflict so that <o> <apostrophe> results in ó. Then we can finally close the book on gtk+/GNOME conflicts. Best regards, Pander > _______________________________________________ > [email protected]: X.Org development > Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel > Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
