On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 13:28:17 +0200, Pander wrote: > On 2012-03-31 13:05, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 16:36:27 +0100, Pander wrote: > > > >> James, Julien, did you receive enough compelling arguments to resolve > >> this conflict so that <o> <apostrophe> results in ó. Then we can finally > >> close the book on gtk+/GNOME conflicts. > >> > > OK. Can you send a patch? > > Sure, see attachtment. Now the apostrophe series is consistent and no > more gtk+/GNOME conflicts exist, see: > That's fine with me. I would still argue for reverting some of the new sequences added in cf040016d455bc37f7665d6714337c5eafd8ea94 though, e.g. for ¥, §, ¤, ² and so on (I've only looked at the top of the diff).
Also you added some sequences like '<Multi_key> <$letter> <minus>' sometimes for '$letter with tilde', and sometimes for '$letter with macron', or '$letter with stroke'. For keysyms that already had existing sequences, and where the new ones don't seem to add much benefit as far as I can tell. Cheers, Julien _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
