On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 17:56:47 +0200, Pander wrote: > Could you please apply that one already so it is of the list and we > discuss the rest below? THanks. > Please send it properly (such as with git send-email) with a commit message, and I'll do that.
> I would still argue for reverting some of the > > new sequences added in cf040016d455bc37f7665d6714337c5eafd8ea94 though, > > e.g. for ¥, §, ¤, ² and so on (I've only looked at the top of the diff). > > From: > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libX11/commit/nls/en_US.UTF-8/Compose.pre?id=cf040016d455bc37f7665d6714337c5eafd8ea94 > > We already threw out several redundant gtk+/GNOME compose sequences for > ¤, ¥ and § that were a bit over the top, there mainly 'o' was replaced > by a '0' (zero) in additional sequences.. > > ¤ does indeed not really need XO, OX, oX, Xo, Ox and xO variations in > the added compose sequences. These new six sequences are for me not > important but are available in gtk+/GNOME. I'm OK with removing: > XO > OX > oX > Xo > Ox > xO > > For ¥, I would argue to keep the added upper case Y combinations that > have been added because the shape of glyph looks like an upper case Y. > And also the added lower case sequences to support = and -. For §, a > similar reasoning. > I'm not sure I follow that reasoning, and I don't think those sequences add any value, but I'm tired of arguing so I guess ok. > For ², ³, µ, etc. keep at least the lower case sequences, also the > reverse sequences. On the upper case 2S, S2, 3S, S3, U/ and /U I have > the same argument as on ¤ above. Doubtful but available in gtk+/GNOME. > I'm OK with removing: > 2S > S2 > 3S > S3 > U/ > /U > > > Also you added some sequences like '<Multi_key> <$letter> <minus>' > > sometimes for '$letter with tilde', and sometimes for '$letter with > > macron', or '$letter with stroke'. For keysyms that already had > > existing sequences, and where the new ones don't seem to add much > > benefit as far as I can tell. > > You mean the ã, Ã, ñ, Ñ, õ and Õ created from letter + minus. These are > also not important to me. If you all insist I am OK with replacing: > a- > -a > A- > -A > o- > -o > O- > -O > with sequences resulting in āĀōŌ conform the current series and removing: > n- > -n > N- > -N > Thanks. Cheers, Julien _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
