On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 10:53 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > On 03/27/12 10:46 AM, Jamey Sharp wrote: > > You're probably thinking of the old X VNC servers that hacked up the > > server source tree. I believe those have been abandoned, but certainly > > this proposed change won't hurt them any more than they already have > > been. > > TigerVNC is alive and well, shipping both Xvnc standalone server and > a vnc.so loadable module for Xorg, neither of which should be broken > by this change. It may be possible to eventually replace Xvnc with a > Xorg server that loads the vnc module with the dummy video driver and > some sort of appropriate input driver (I don't think void will cut it, > nor running without input) - but given the GPL license on that code, > I'm happiest keeping Xvnc as a completely separate binary.
X11vnc is different of TigerVNC URL : http://www.karlrunge.com/x11vnc/ Summary : VNC server for the current X11 session -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
