On 03/28/2012 01:36 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 10:53 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: >> On 03/27/12 10:46 AM, Jamey Sharp wrote: >>> You're probably thinking of the old X VNC servers that hacked up the >>> server source tree. I believe those have been abandoned, but certainly >>> this proposed change won't hurt them any more than they already have >>> been. >> >> TigerVNC is alive and well, shipping both Xvnc standalone server and >> a vnc.so loadable module for Xorg, neither of which should be broken >> by this change. It may be possible to eventually replace Xvnc with a >> Xorg server that loads the vnc module with the dummy video driver and >> some sort of appropriate input driver (I don't think void will cut it, >> nor running without input) - but given the GPL license on that code, >> I'm happiest keeping Xvnc as a completely separate binary. > > X11vnc is different of TigerVNC > URL : http://www.karlrunge.com/x11vnc/ > Summary : VNC server for the current X11 session
TigerVNC includes x0vncserver which does the same thing. _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
