Adam Jackson <[email protected]> writes: > This was necessary in DRI1 for a variety of reasons (SAREA ownership, > VRAM layout, etc). None of that is relevant to DRI2. Which is good, > because VT switch is an xf86-ism and I'd like to make DRI2 > ddx-independent. > > Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <[email protected]>
We still do this? Not cool. The only risk I see is if it means that new clients race ahead to trying to do dri2 auth and fail because we've dropped master.
pgpJXbo9BAqoH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
