On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Eric Anholt <[email protected]> wrote: > Adam Jackson <[email protected]> writes: > >> This was necessary in DRI1 for a variety of reasons (SAREA ownership, >> VRAM layout, etc). None of that is relevant to DRI2. Which is good, >> because VT switch is an xf86-ism and I'd like to make DRI2 >> ddx-independent. >> >> Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <[email protected]> > > We still do this? Not cool. > > The only risk I see is if it means that new clients race ahead to trying > to do dri2 auth and fail because we've dropped master.
yeah don't VT switch during a piglit run, it won't end well. The thing is I suspect some app have grown used to this behaviour and will act all crappy on VT switch without it. Dave. _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
