Daniel Stone <[email protected]> writes:

> whilst not doing anything surprising like having a base modifier down
> which was never pressed on that device.

Are you saying that we should only mirror the locking modifier state
From master to slaves? That seems plausible, but seems more complicated
and not all that useful to me, as now the slave will report some, but
not all, of the master modifier state.

-- 
[email protected]

Attachment: pgpT37QADL5JG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to