Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> writes:
> I'm fine with either 3 or 4 tbh, though note that from the user's POV we > already do 4. open xterm, hit ctrl one one keyboard and C on the other and > you'll get a ctrl+c through the core protocol and from the XI2 master. Right, I wanted to enumerate all of the choices and differences between them, even though I think we all agree that differences visible through slave devices are largely irrelevant. In any case, I think the only concern here is that the state of the master lock indicators get reflected to all slave devices, and whether you do that by mirroring the indicators, lock modifiers or all of the modifiers is largely irrelevant. I think Daniel's concern was that by trying to reflect all of the modifiers, even those which may mis-match between different slaves, you may accidentally cause further damage. Would it be difficult to map the non-standard modifier bits by keysym and try to reflect those accurately? -- [email protected]
pgptUKUcd5fGY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
