On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 02:28:55PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> writes: > > > the less-intrusive alternative would be to force only the indicator state > > down to the slaves. won't change keyboard behaviour as seen by the client > > and still has the effect that most people expect from their keyboards. > > comments? > > That seems even weirder to me -- you've got a NumLock light on, and yet > your keyboard doesn't have NumLock pressed when seen as a slave?
the recommendation for XI2 was always to not handle slaves separately when they're attached to a master device, because any event will feed into the master. it's a fine line between doing what the user expects and not breaking what we did for the last couple of years. there is no good solution here, it's just a question which foot we prefer shooting at. Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
