Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> writes: > NAK for these changes. I'll be using the *_nf functions in the radeon > driver soon, and I expect there might be interest for something similar > in the modesetting driver and/or Xwayland in the long term as well.
So, these seem backwards to me - you're asking glamor to accelerate something, and if it can't, then the driver is given a shot before falling back to software. It seems like if you have some acceleration in your driver which should be used, then you probably want to select it *before* even trying glamor. In that case, having your driver wrap glamor seems like it would make a lot more sense, and should be easier to support in the long term. And, it means that everyone uses glamor through the same interface, and we don't end up with mysterious hardware-dependent bugs in glamor. -- -keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
