On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 13:28 +0000, Eric Engestrom wrote: > I looked a bit more into this, and while I don't know much about glamor > (or glsl, to be honest), I don't think this fix is correct. > > Was `pos` in glamor_program.c intended to be `gl_Position`, by any > chance? That would make more sense to me.
I pushed essentially this version of the patch (pos not gl_Position), having not read far enough down in the mailbox to see this version. (And, Dieter's right, picking on the little shit really is counterproductive for one-liners.) That said, gl_Position is probably right. But I think dashing is broken already, so at least now we're just rendering wrong instead of crashing. If someone wants to get rendering correct too, please do... - ajax _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
