On Dec 18, 08 18:34:26 +1100, Graeme Gill wrote: > Matthias Hopf wrote: > > AFAIR we agreed on that this property name can just be changed without > > breaking backward compatibility, because it was never agreed upon that > > this was a standard so far. > > I guess I can always add yet another EDID atom string check > to my display color profile management code, but is there a > reason to change it ?
It conforms to the standard naming scheme we AFAIU agreed on on the mailing list. I'd have no issues with adding a non-advocated EDID_DATA again to the server, if that sounds fit reasonable. Keith? Matthias -- Matthias Hopf <[email protected]> __ __ __ Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg (_ | | (_ |__ [email protected] Phone +49-911-74053-715 __) |_| __) |__ R & D www.mshopf.de _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
