Matthias Hopf wrote:
> I have just pushed a change to radeonhd, that implements the mandatory
> bits of RandR 1.3 output properties, which can thus be seen as a
> reference implementation.

Sorry I guess I'm not following very well :- so this means that
the XRandR EDID_DATA atom now becomes what ?

RANDR_EDID_DATA ?
_EDID_DATA ?
_RANDR_EDID_DATA  ?

thanks,
        Graeme Gill.
_______________________________________________
xorg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

Reply via email to