On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 03:17:16PM -0800, Stuart Kreitman wrote: > On 02/10/10 11:47 AM, Daniel Stone wrote: > > (tl;dr: Yes, I agree that the Foundation needs to be doing a lot more, > > but nothing we've done is hidden from our members, i.e. board > > members know basically as much as you, and that this is a result > > of lack of time/etc, rather than any desire to keep any > > information private. Yes, we should be doing better.) > > > > Hi, > > > > Disclaimer: All of this is off the top of my head. I could be and am > > probably wrong on some of the details. This does not represent an > > official statement on behalf of the Foundation, etc, etc. > > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 06:31:32PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > > > >> The X.org Foundation exists to best represent the interests of the X.org > >> Foundation members, by being the legal entity responsible for the state > >> of the Foundation. To a large extent, its responsibility is to manage > >> the considerable amount of funds that the X.org foundation has gathered > >> over the years, in the best interest of these X.org foundation members. > >> > > Rather. For the record, I think the current balance is on the order of > > ~$us150k. Around the time we dissolved the sponsors' group, we decided > > > As co-signer of the checks, that sounds really high, My guess is that its > knocked down to 1/2 that by now, but I haven't seen the exact balance for > a few years now. This needs to be sorted before comittments for the next > conference are made. Keith? >
So, Stuart, you are not on the board, but you have to cosign the checks... How come there seems to be no certainty about the amount still available? Luc Verhaegen. _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
