The design decision that was made was to make the applications the clients, and the program that sits next to keyboard and monitor the server. And I admit that now this is a real server. But I pretend it was a bad choice.
The question is what are the ressources you want to share? Now the ressources shared seems to be the keyboard, mouse and monitor. What I think the users want to use or share is the X applications. That's why I think that X would be more usefull if the order was reversed. Because then, the X server would sit there, waiting for client (that would be humans rather than programs), to connect and the ressources shared would be X applications. Why would someone want to share his monitor, keyboard an mouse on the net? That does not seems useful. _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: [email protected]
