Am Mittwoch, 20. April 2011 schrieb Paul Dufresne: > The design decision that was made was to make the applications the > clients, and the program that sits next to keyboard and monitor the > server. And I admit that now this is a real server. > But I pretend it was a bad choice. > > The question is what are the ressources you want to share? > Now the ressources shared seems to be the keyboard, mouse and monitor. > > What I think the users want to use or share is the X applications. > > That's why I think that X would be more usefull if the order was reversed. > Because then, the X server would sit there, waiting for client (that > would be humans rather than programs), to connect and the ressources > shared would be X applications. > > Why would someone want to share his monitor, keyboard an mouse on the net? > That does not seems useful.
Oh, it's very useful. Ever tried to build a system with 32 distributed screens? Nik _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: [email protected]
