Hi Daniel,

My experience running Xournal on windows is extremely limited... As far 
as I can tell:

1. The main issue that seems to have been reported is interference 
between the Windows pen (or touch?) interface and the input passed to 
GTK+ and Xournal. This results either in lags, rough strokes, or other 
sub-optimal responsiveness of the pen input in xournal. This should be 
looked into, and most likely is either fixable within the Windows 
control panel or not easily fixable at all.

I am also dubious that high resolution input is available on non-wacom 
devices, so perhaps stroke smoothing would be a nice feature to think about.

2. There's probably a few minor bugs or misfeatures here or there; one I 
can think of is that the handling of text fonts is haphazard and may not 
be fully functional. The code to embed fonts in the "export to PDF" 
feature is probably hard to fix (and too unreadable to even attempt to 
fix), but at least the on-screen display and printing via gtk-print 
should work with minor tweaks.

I'm also not sure that copy-paste between xournal and other applications 
works properly.

Best,
Denis



On 07/23/2013 04:39 PM, D M German wrote:
>
> hi Everybody,
>
> I wonder if any of you use xournal on a windows computer.
>
> I am ready to throw the towel on android. none of the annotations
> applications have the ease-of-use that Xournal has when it comes to
> annotating PDFs. But using a tablet-with-no-keyboard in linux is still
> too challenging.
>
> I am thinking on buying a Lenovo Tablet 2 (it seems to be one of the
> best non ios-android tablets in the market today) and it supports a
> stylus with pressure sensitivity.
>
> does any of you use xournal on windows? how good is it? Is there
> anything that you would like to improve on it with respect to the Linux
> version?
>
> thanks!
>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel M. German                  "Mathematicians often marvel
>                                     at how they dream up concepts
>                                     such as "zero" or "sum",
>                                     and then seem to have
>                                     no say about how these things behave.
>                                     But they can decide how they look,
>                                     and that is not a science.
>     The Economist ->                So it must be art."
> http://turingmachine.org/
> http://silvernegative.com/
> dmg (at) uvic (dot) ca
> replace (at) with @ and (dot) with .
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
> Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
> Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
> Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Xournal-devel mailing list
> Xournal-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xournal-devel
>

-- 
Denis Auroux                             aur...@math.berkeley.edu
University of California, Berkeley       Tel: 510-642-4367
Department of Mathematics                Fax: 510-642-8204
817 Evans Hall # 3840
Berkeley, CA 94720-3840

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Xournal-devel mailing list
Xournal-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xournal-devel

Reply via email to