Thanks for this really quick and in-depth answer, this is a great first
experience of the project's community :)

I will try this, but possibly only after christmas, and report back where I
got with it.
2015. dec. 23. de. 11:18 ezt írta ("Niklas Hauser" <

> Hi Szabó,
> I just found xpcc, and it seems very promising. In my project I use an
> STM32F103RC, and if I try to build a really simple project for it, I
> get this error: "Error: XPCC Error: Could not find xml device file.”.
> We wanted to only add Device Files for devices that we have tested.
> I think I will just add a bunch of device files, so that we can get
> hackers like you to not have to also deal with the hacky and undocumented
> device file generator (sorry).
> I looked in the tools/device_file_generator directory, but I don't
> really know how to use it. So my question is, what do I have to do to
> be able to use this mcu?
> Here are all of my up-to-date device files:
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/ea16rjmgdp4s63m/xpcc_xml_2015_12-23.zip?dl=0
> It contains the right file for the STM32F103rc (stm32f103-r_v_z-c_d_e.xml)
> plus a bunch more stuff.
> We don’t yet generate linkerscripts automatically (*poke* *poke* @ekiwi),
> so you also need to add a file to
> src/xpcc/architecture/platform/linker/stm32   called   stm32f103_c.ld
> with this content:
> {
> ROM (rx)  : ORIGIN = 0x08000000, LENGTH = 256k
> RAM (rwx) : ORIGIN = 0x20000000, LENGTH = 48k
> }
> INCLUDE stm32_ram.ld
> I can compile it, when changing the project file for the STM32F1 blinky to
> stm32f103rc.
> https://github.com/roboterclubaachen/xpcc/blob/develop/examples/stm32f1_discovery/blink/project.cfg#L9
> I don’t have a F103 handy at the moment, so I haven’t tested this in
> hardware, but it might just be similar enough to the STM32F100 to just work
> (@24MHz though).
> You will very likely have to manually configure the clock tree using this
> class (well, the generated class):
> https://github.com/roboterclubaachen/xpcc/blob/develop/src/xpcc/architecture/platform/driver/clock/stm32/clock.hpp.in
> The problem is that we cannot yet generate the System Clock Tree classes
> automatically, but there is a PR for that:
> https://github.com/roboterclubaachen/xpcc/pull/39
> I will have a closer look at the System Clock over the holidays.
> Happy Hacking,
> Niklas
> _______________________________________________
> xpcc-dev mailing list
> xpcc-dev@lists.rwth-aachen.de
> http://mailman.rwth-aachen.de/mailman/listinfo/xpcc-dev
xpcc-dev mailing list

Reply via email to