On 31-Oct-01 at 17:09, Brian J. Murrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31,
2001 at 12:01:09PM +0600, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
> >      BTW, you wrote "I guess most people use Xinerama. I would gladly
> > use it if I could specify which screens to bind together.".  What do you
> > mean by that?  Is it about relative placement of screens (completely
> > doable), or do you need to join only some screens into Xinerama, while
> > leaving others as separate :0.x's
> 
> The latter.  The third head is connected to a TV via a "TV-Out"
> supporting card.  I don't really want the TV as part of my desktop
> real estate.

Can you not run a separate X server and call it display 1 (:1.0) instead of
screen 3 (:0.3)????


> 
> > (not likely to be ever implemented,
> > according to Mark V.)?
> 
> I wonder why selective binding of screens will never be implemented
> with Xinerama.  It seems to me to be a natural progression in
> the evolution of Xinerama.
> 
> b.
> 
> -- 
> Brian J. Murrell
> _______________________________________________
> Xpert mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert

_______________________________________________
Xpert mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert

Reply via email to