Mike A. Harris wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Christian Berger wrote: > > >>> Netscape is much faster than Mozilla. I think it's just that some >>>design decisions in the X version of Mozilla, which is probably much >>>different than the Window's version, are suboptimal. Having seen enough >>> >>Well I doubt Mozilla for Windows is faster than Mozilla for Linux. >> > > You've not tried it then. Mozilla for Windows running on my box > on one processor runs faster than Mozilla in Linux running on > both processors. (Win98SE). Application startup time is faster > for Mozilla in Windows, as is runtime execution. Not measured or > benchmarked mind you. It is visibly noticeable.
I'm really hoping this thread dies soon, but I've got to chime in here. There is absolutely no comparison between the windows gui and X. I routinely have 10-15 windows open, which would include at least 2 mozilla mail windows and minimally 3-4 browser windows. I also have 2 desktops with 3 virtual desktops each. You just don't get that kind of functionality with a Windows gui and if you tried to have that many windows open on win95, win98, nt, win2k, it would purely meltdown. I have no experience with winxp and don't plan to, but I suspect it's no different. The above argument appears to revolve around Mozilla, not X. -- Until later: Geoffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] I didn't have to buy my radio from a specific company to listen to FM, why doesn't that apply to the Internet (anymore...)? _______________________________________________ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
