Harald Meland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The fact that it's named .arch-log-library and not .tla-log-library >> is also intentional: Another arch client could use it. > > Until there actually is some agreement to use this kind of structure > from other frontends besides xtla, I think it would make more sense if > the directory name better reflected the fact that the structure > currently is xtla-specific.
I disagree here: This would mean renaming the directory if someone else starts using it. I don't like the idea of moving configuration directories from one version to the other. -- Matthieu
