Mark Triggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > After mergin your tree, I found following code in xtla. > > > > (defun tla-browse-category-widget-new (archive category &optional open-p > > in-revlib) > > (let ((widget (tla-browse-element-widget-new > > 'category "c" archive category))) > > (widget-put widget :in-revlib in-revlib) > > (widget-put widget :open open-p) > > widget)) > > > > Is this indentation what you want? > > Should we use this indentation style? > > It is difficult for me to read list source code with this indentation.
That was a mistake - see below. > For what it's worth, I agree.. I find the following easier to read (and > it's what emacs does automatically :o): I fully agree! > > (defun tla-browse-category-widget-new (archive category &optional open-p > > in-revlib) > > (let ((widget (tla-browse-element-widget-new > > 'category "c" archive category))) > > (widget-put widget :in-revlib in-revlib) > > (widget-put widget :open open-p) > > widget)) > > Stefan: I've found before that if my `tab-width' variable is set to > something less than 8 (I usually set it at 4) I get this sort of > problem when untabifying too. Could this be what happened? Yes that happened when I untabified the source code. That is also one reason, that I do not like tabs! Sorry for causing some confusion. To summarize my standpoint: * Use spaces, no tabs * Use emacs default indentation -- Stefan.
