> > Probably a good general convention would be
> >
> > * Capital letters => prefix for other commands
> >
> > * Lower-case letters => commands.
> >
> > That's mainly how Gnus works.
>
> That is a good strategy.
Do you think we should apply this strategy to all the other bindings?
We have already defined many key bindigs which break the new strategy.
(defvar tla--key-help ??) ; help
(defvar tla--key-mark-prefix ?*) ; other mark related command prefix
(defvar tla--key-apply-from-here ?.) ; apply something from here
(defvar tla--key-get ?>) ; prefix for getting something
(defvar tla--key-mirror ?<) ; mirror
(defvar tla--key-parent ?^) ; visit uppper XXX. e.g. directory
(defvar tla--key-diff ?=) ; one shot
(defvar tla--key-add ?a) ; prefix for adding something
(defvar tla--key-diff-prefix ?d)
(defvar tla--key-ediff ?e)
(defvar tla--key-refresh ?g) ; update or refresh buffer
(defvar tla--key-mark ?m) ; mark
(defvar tla--key-next ?n) ; next item
(defvar tla--key-previous ?p) ; previous item
(defvar tla--key-quit ?q) ; quit
(defvar tla--key-remove ?r) ; prefix for remove something
(defvar tla--key-toggle ?t) ; prefix for toggle
(defvar tla--key-unmark ?u) ; unmark
(defvar tla--key-kill-ring-prefix ?w)
(defvar tla--key-buffer-prefix ?B) ; perfix for switching XXX buffer
(defvar tla--key-directory-prefix ?D)
(defvar tla--key-merge-prefix ?M)
(defvar tla--key-revert ?U)
(defvar tla--key-working-copy ?W) ; Affecting on working copy
Also we have following rules and conflicts with the new strategy.
;; 3. Upper case for commands taking longer time to be executed.
;; 4. Lowwer case for commands taking shorter time to be executed.
