Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Right. The problem was that I included your base-0 in my merge, and a >> bunch of old patches got reapplied and made a general mess of things >> :o) There's a patch in my archive (patch-79) that undoes all of this >> and should set things right. > > It means all of you should not merge my base-0?
I think it's right that base-0 shouldn't be merged (I just did a tla-revision-sync-tree on it to ignore it). > All disasters are introduced by me... *laughs* I wonder if there would be another way of reversing an accidental tag.. I can see how what happened would be an easy mistake to make. Creating another version is easy enough for us, anyway. >> Everyone: please be sure to apply my patch-79 if you have applied my >> patch-77. > > It seems that your patch-79 is nor mirrored yet. Whoops. It should be there now :o) -- Mark Triggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
