Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Hrm. I'm not totally sure. I created patch-79 with the following >> steps: >> >> * tla get xtla--main--0.1--patch-78 >> * tla replay --reverse xtla--main--0.1--patch-77 >> * tla sync-tree xtla--main--0.1--patch-77 # (to grab the patch log) >> * tla commit ... > > What you did is the completely the same what I did when I incorporate > Mile's emacs tree into my archive. I'll do above with patch-147 at > patch-148.
Thinking about it some more, I suspect that having the two patch logs (147 and 148) in there will probably be alright. I think the problem with patch-147 and patch-148 was that patch-147 added all the emacs files and patch-148 removed them. In the case of my patch-79, it will add the log files but none of the emacs files, so it should probably be fine. Hopefully ;o) Mark -- Mark Triggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
